<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If the answer is 42 what&#8217;s the question?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wheelsofchance.org/2009/08/28/if-the-answer-is-42-whats-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wheelsofchance.org/2009/08/28/if-the-answer-is-42-whats-the-question/</link>
	<description>A bicycle blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:54:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trefix</title>
		<link>http://wheelsofchance.org/2009/08/28/if-the-answer-is-42-whats-the-question/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trefix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wheelsofchance.org/?p=406#comment-90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True, sorry.

First, it was on my &quot; rat bike &quot;( with 52t-42t) and I&#039;d just change rings. 28 is the lower ring allowed and a 69/107 mm BB gives perfect chain line and very low Q factor.

(&quot; Rat &quot; during conversion, with Simplex FD : http://apu.mabul.org/up/apu/2008/11/15/img-213944t2pv7.jpg)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, sorry.</p>
<p>First, it was on my &#8221; rat bike &#8220;( with 52t-42t) and I&#8217;d just change rings. 28 is the lower ring allowed and a 69/107 mm BB gives perfect chain line and very low Q factor.</p>
<p>(&#8221; Rat &#8221; during conversion, with Simplex FD : <a href="http://apu.mabul.org/up/apu/2008/11/15/img-213944t2pv7.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://apu.mabul.org/up/apu/2008/11/15/img-213944t2pv7.jpg</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cstandley</title>
		<link>http://wheelsofchance.org/2009/08/28/if-the-answer-is-42-whats-the-question/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cstandley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wheelsofchance.org/?p=406#comment-89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Trefix,
I&#039;m not certain, but that Stronglight 80 you mention might have an 86mm BCD. Anyway 42 and something in the 20&#039;s is a nice double.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Trefix,<br />
I&#8217;m not certain, but that Stronglight 80 you mention might have an 86mm BCD. Anyway 42 and something in the 20&#8242;s is a nice double.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trefix</title>
		<link>http://wheelsofchance.org/2009/08/28/if-the-answer-is-42-whats-the-question/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trefix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wheelsofchance.org/?p=406#comment-87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m now using an old Shimano Tourney front derailleur (double) on my Elan, with a Stonglight 42t-28t (80 mm diameter, 5 bolts) and it works fine !

Salutations cuclotouristes ;)

Trefix]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now using an old Shimano Tourney front derailleur (double) on my Elan, with a Stonglight 42t-28t (80 mm diameter, 5 bolts) and it works fine !</p>
<p>Salutations cuclotouristes <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Trefix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cstandley</title>
		<link>http://wheelsofchance.org/2009/08/28/if-the-answer-is-42-whats-the-question/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cstandley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wheelsofchance.org/?p=406#comment-27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went with the 42t ring to give me 67&quot; gearing with a neutral chain line, as that&#039;s where I ride most of the time. I like not having to think about front ring changes and don&#039;t mind the large steps between gears as they are only an issue if you are racing. For a road bike I&#039;d probably go with a 48/34 compact double with a 12/27 cassette.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went with the 42t ring to give me 67&#8243; gearing with a neutral chain line, as that&#8217;s where I ride most of the time. I like not having to think about front ring changes and don&#8217;t mind the large steps between gears as they are only an issue if you are racing. For a road bike I&#8217;d probably go with a 48/34 compact double with a 12/27 cassette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://wheelsofchance.org/2009/08/28/if-the-answer-is-42-whats-the-question/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wheelsofchance.org/?p=406#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On my heavy commuter I run a Sugino XD triple with 46/36/26.  I keep 11-32t in the back.  The stock crank had a 50t, but I never used half of the cassette.  The whole setup is 8 speed friction via ultegra bar end shifters.

I suppose a 42t would split the difference between my middle and big ring, but my setup has very easy front shifting as is.

My tastes for a road bike are totally different.  I constantly am shifting the rear, but only sparingly shift up front.  In that case, I like a lot of range on the front rings, but tight increments on the rear cassette.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my heavy commuter I run a Sugino XD triple with 46/36/26.  I keep 11-32t in the back.  The stock crank had a 50t, but I never used half of the cassette.  The whole setup is 8 speed friction via ultegra bar end shifters.</p>
<p>I suppose a 42t would split the difference between my middle and big ring, but my setup has very easy front shifting as is.</p>
<p>My tastes for a road bike are totally different.  I constantly am shifting the rear, but only sparingly shift up front.  In that case, I like a lot of range on the front rings, but tight increments on the rear cassette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

